From Talk to Action: Why CUF Projects Are Different
- Container User Forum
- Sep 20
- 1 min read
The container sector does not lack ideas. Over the years, countless forums, committees and workshops have proposed solutions to congestion, back-of-port bottlenecks, and unreliable rail.
The problem has never been shortage of ideas, rather it’s a shortage of execution.
Too often, initiatives get stuck in endless debate, or fade away when key people move on.
CUF is designed differently. Every initiative must have a Project Charter. That means:
A defined scope (what’s in and what’s out).
A budget and funding source.
A timeline and milestones.
KPIs to measure baseline vs outcome.
A non-discrimination test (system-level benefit, not sectional gain).
A reporting plan, so members see progress each quarter.
This discipline ensures that CUF projects move from concept to measurable results. If a project doesn’t deliver, it is stopped. If it works, it is scaled.
The focus is not on the “what” but on the outcomes members care about most:
Reduced container dwell and faster vessel, truck and train turnarounds.
Reliable back-of-port staging and empty container flows.
Increased rail share and smoother intermodal operations.
Transparent dashboards with data aligned to global standards.
Skills uplift so local operators can meet international benchmarks.
CUF members don’t pay for endless talk. They fund a lean Secretariat and ring-fenced project account that turns decisions into delivery.
👉 Join CUF and ensure that your contribution buys measurable outcomes, not more meetings.



Comments